So, Problems with crowdmatching + proposing an alternative is long and in-depth. It isn’t really about design directly, it’s about broader feedback, attitudes, state-of-the-world etc. brought up by debates about fundamental design questions.
I don’t think it should be in the design category or even in clearing-the-path. It seems more like broad philosophy of crowdmatching, FLO projects, game theory, economics… So:
- I think we need a better place for this type of broad discussion, and not just “unsure”
- I think we need tags:
- some tag indicating that this has LONG posts, like to understand that this is long-form conversation
- some tag indicating that this is like a special highlighted post for those who want in-depth perspective
- my goal being to highlight posts that may be especially interesting reading (not just some long-winded but uninteresting chatter)