Hi,
I wanted to introduce you to the concept of specularity because I think it’s a great concept to understand (and thus explain) why SnowDrift works better at raising money for public good(s).
Specularity is a concept I read about in Yves Cochet’s postscript of Pablo Servigne’s and Raphaël Stevens’ book How Everything Can Collapse: A Manual for our Times and I have been obsessed with it since.
Quoting Yves Cochet’s postscript:
Specularity and “specular interaction” were introduced in 1989 by Jean-Louis Vullierme in his book Le concept de système politique.
The idea is that people watch each other to decide whether to act or not.
“I’m ready to make an effort if I know other people are ready to make an effort.”
Specularity is a term borrowed from opics (specularize is synonym to “hold a mirror to”).
I think the fact that “everyone watches what everyone else is doing” is the reason fundraising events like Z Event or Telethon are so efficient at raising money.
And SnowDrift is a big innovation in that regard, because thanks to SnowDrift, we probably won’t need to bother organizing such events to raise large sums of money.
I’m not saying SnowDrift would benefit in using the word “specularity” in its marketing (hell no ^^).
But I do think people understand psychology and sociology better than maths. And since everyone, I think, can empathize with the idea that “I’m ready to make an effort if I know other people are ready to make an effort”, SnowDrift might make more sense to them presented this way when, sometimes, from what I have read on this forum, they might be perplexed when presented with the counter-intuitive system where
more people ⇒ more money spent per person
I’ve started reading Vullierme’s book and it’s fascinating. Some parts where he talks about specular interactions reminded me of mutually recursive acronyms:
- HURD = HIRD of Unix-Replacing Daemons
- HIRD = HURD of Interfaces Representing Depth
He says people’s minds (their representations of the world) are kind of like that, except they don’t create in an infinite loop (hopefully).