Sorry to bring this up so late: but are we set with the selection of platforms?
The triggering issue is that the layout (especially in small sizes) does not account for 6 platforms to be compared.
On one hand I see the benefit of having a more sensible comparison the bigger the chart – on the other hand we should weight the extra amount of data we confront people with.
- I think Kofi and Flatter are not necessary.
The compared platforms should be established and well known to position ourselves in the crowdfunding space. Lesser known platforms shouldn’t even be given a platform here
On a side note I also think we could maintain and link to a more complete overview in the wiki for the extra benefit of having well known but also smaller but relevant projects covered. Historically this seems to be of value for many interested people after all…