Continuing the discussion from Building consensus on crowdmatching options for a single goal:
I’m really hesitant to vote on this. I agree with qualifications. I want us to keep polling one another on things we can completely support without qualification. Those things become the set defining features within which we discuss other things.
So, I just have a concern about the wording here. If this poll is meant to say “are you willing to add this idea to the set decisions for the mechanism?” My answer is “no”. I think a starting default set of pledge levels makes sense, but whether some projects really deviate from that in their set, I’m not decided on that. It might be fine enough.
I’m okay with niche projects and also projects that just want 10-cents from a huge crowd. Maybe even allowing eventually projects to limit pledges to such tiny numbers.
I don’t want to discuss that here, but I wanted to understand the goal of the poll. Because I do agree that at least for beta, we probably want to not have tons of variation in the pledge options as people get used to the system. But I’m not sure.